Abstract: The paper re-examines the controversies of P. Lacau’s old observation on a binary opposition of the anatomical terminology of Ancient Egyptian in the context of many new results issuing from current progress in Afro-Asiatic (Semito-Hamitic) comparative linguistics. The presented etymological examination of the Ancient Egyptian anatomical terminology corroborated a surprising distribution: one member of the synonymous pairs is usually a Semitic word, whereas the other one(s) have non-Semitic cognate(s) solely attested in some of the African branches of our language macrofamily. A relatively deeper presence of the extra-Semitic vocabulary in Egyptian has also become apparent.
This website is in the beta phase of development, meaning that it is currently being worked on. We have decided to make OMNIKA available to the public during all development phases. It may not contain all planned features and services. Things may be incomplete or partially broken, which may hinder user experience.
You can expect the following:
Minor bugs
Minor downtime
Ongoing testing and rapid feature release cycles
Missing features
Average load times
If you are doing academic or scholarly research, it's pretty safe to rely on our data to be accurate and up to date. For more information, check our release notes.
